2024’s Tourist Taxes: A Solution for Over-Tourism or Just a Band-Aid?
In the vibrant streets of Barcelona, tourists found themselves under siege—not from riots or protests, but from playful water pistols wielded by passionate locals.
Meanwhile, in the bustling heart of Seoul, night owls were abruptly ushered off the streets, as authorities clamped down on after-dark revelry.
On the picturesque shores of Maui, fishing lines were cast where playful swimmers once frolicked, signaling a shift in the local vibe.
And in the serene town of Fujikawaguchiko, a massive 20-meter blockade marred the view for eager photographers hoping to capture the majestic Mount Fuji.
It’s safe to say that in 2024, tourists have faced some decidedly unwelcome receptions!
Frustrated locals often point fingers at tourists, blaming them for skyrocketing prices, shrinking housing availability, and overcrowded public spaces.
As tensions simmered, governments worldwide scrambled to implement a common solution—the tourist tax.
This year, countries ranging from Bali to Venice, Iceland to Aruba, and even Thailand and Wales, have rolled out new tourism taxes.
Others, like New Zealand, have drastically increased existing fees, tripling entry costs from $NZ35 to $NZ100 (around $31 to $90) in September alone.
But while these taxes might please policymakers, will they actually stem the tide of tourists?
From Hero to Zero: The Changing Face of Tourism
Tourism taxes aren’t new; they come in various forms—from flat fees tagged onto visas and flight costs to modest nightly surcharges on hotel stays.
However, the recent surge in enthusiasm for these levies stems from the pandemic’s disruption of global travel, providing countries a moment to reevaluate their tourism strategies, according to tourism expert Tracey Harkison from the Auckland University of Technology.
“Queenstown, with its population of 19,000, was hosting 1.25 million visitors annually—a situation that just isn’t sustainable,” she noted.
“There’s a clear desire among communities to reduce visitor numbers for a healthier balance.”
In fact, some communities are taking matters into their own hands where authorities have been slow to respond.
In the Canary Islands, anti-tourism activists vandalized resorts, slashing hundreds of sunbeds and spray-painting slogans like “The Canary Islands will defend itself.”
Do Taxes Really Deter Tourists?
Some lawmakers view tourism taxes as a quick fix to a complex issue, despite pushback from the industry.
In Wales, local businesses protested a proposed £1.60 nightly tax by closing their doors, while New Zealand’s tourism sector predicted that increased taxes could scare off 48,000 visitors.
Yet, after Venice implemented a 5 euro entrance fee to manage crowds during peak season, the city saw an uptick of 7,000 daily visitors, according to reports.
CEO Dean Long of Australia’s Travel Industry Association asserts that there’s no solid evidence to suggest that tourism taxes effectively reduce crowds.
“In reality, it just means visitors will spend less money in those destinations,” he remarked.
“Thinking that a tax will make everyone feel better is a misguided and ineffective public policy approach to a nuanced challenge.”
Long believes that the recent surge in tourism taxes mirrors governments’ need to recover funding spent during the pandemic.
“The tourism sector has become the frontline for increased taxes, as it’s seen as a cash grab that doesn’t typically rally voter opposition,” he lamented.
Can Tax Revenues Cover the Damage?
While governments often tout tourism taxes as a means to fund infrastructure and conservation efforts, sustainable tourism expert James Higham critiques even New Zealand’s hefty $NZ100 fee as woefully insufficient.
“While the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy may fund local amenities, what about essential services like wastewater management or electricity supply?” he remarked in his podcast, Checking In.
“Though $100 sounds steep, it really does little to alleviate the burden on taxpayers and local residents.”
While New Zealand’s tax is earmarked for specific projects, others flow directly into the government’s general fund, often used at its discretion.
Additionally, poorly designed tax systems can underperform, as seen in Bali’s new $15 tax, where only 40% of visitors paid up in its inaugural month.
Taming the ‘Pandora’s Box’ of Mass Tourism
In response to the challenges of mass tourism, some nations are exploring alternatives to monetary solutions, like visitor caps.
South Korea has implemented a tourist curfew in the historic Bukchon Hanok Village, while Italy has banned key lock boxes used by rental services like Airbnb in certain districts.
Yet, as Lonely Planet’s travel writer Bradley Mayhew points out, it’s an uphill battle to reduce the cultural and environmental impacts once you’ve already drawn a million tourists.
“Once you’ve opened Pandora’s box of mass tourism, it’s incredibly difficult to close it,” he stated.
Some regions are trying to distribute tourist traffic more evenly by promoting lesser-known attractions and off-peak visiting times.
However, social media often exacerbates the problem by directing a swarm of visitors to the most “Instagrammable” spots.
“Italy, for instance, is home to countless enchanting villages, but everyone gravitates toward the same three,” Mayhew lamented.
Taking Taxation to New Heights
In Bhutan, safeguarding local culture is paramount, leading to a daily visitor charge of $200.
Though this fee was temporarily halved post-pandemic, many locals endorse the tax as a measure to control visitor numbers.
“Bhutan is a small nation, nestled between the behemoths of China and India. Its cultural identity is delicate, and it cannot afford to let mass tourism run rampant,” Mayhew remarked.
“The country understands that maintaining its uniqueness is vital.”
Carissa Nimah, Bhutan’s chief marketing officer, stated that the revenue from the tourism tax supports public services, including free healthcare, ensuring that tourism benefits the entire community.
“This strategy not only benefits Bhutan but also secures a bright future for generations to come,” she noted, despite pushback from industry players eager for more visitors.
“For a small nation of 750,000, imagine the strain of 1 or 2 million tourists annually,” she cautioned.
“It could erode the very essence that makes Bhutan special.”
Nimah emphasized that Bhutan’s focus on “high-value” tourism over sheer volume has garnered interest from other nations and organizations looking to learn from their approach.
“As the issue of over-tourism becomes increasingly challenging, more destinations are turning to us for insights,” she shared.
Yet, even with high fees in place, Bhutan anticipates visitor numbers will surpass pre-pandemic levels of 350,000 by 2025.
Is There an End to the Tourist Influx?
In the 15 years leading up to the pandemic, international tourism saw an astounding doubling to 1.5 billion arrivals, a milestone eclipsed this year, with growth expected to continue.
For many communities around the globe, tourism is not just a source of income—it’s a lifeline that fosters economic growth, cultural exchange, and international recognition.
Tracey Harkison points out that for New Zealand, the notion of limiting visitors conflicts with the Maori principle of manaakitanga, which emphasizes that newcomers are treated as family.
Instead, the government is exploring sustainable futures for tourism through increased taxes, improved management, and a broader array of experiences.
“Perfection is unattainable, as it’s impossible to please everyone,” she admitted.
“Our goal should be to steer towards a more regenerative and sustainable industry, or we risk losing the very treasures that draw tourists to us.”