Mortgages

Unlocking the Secrets: Mark Calabria’s Take on Mortgages & Rates!


Photo: Jimlop collection/Alamy

If you’re a homeowner, chances are your mortgage is tied to one of two major players in the game: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) scoop up mortgages, bundle them into securities, and sell them to eager investors. Supporters tout their role in promoting homeownership and safeguarding the beloved 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. On the flip side, critics warn that they inject unnecessary risk into the financial system. Who’s right?

Enter Mark Calabria, former head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the watchdog over these GSEs. In a revealing interview, Calabria lays out his case against Fannie and Freddie, suggesting they do little to enhance homeownership. Buckle up; this is a debate that could reshape your understanding of the housing market!

Q: Proponents argue that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are crucial for maintaining the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. What’s your take?

A: Let’s break it down. The magic of the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is simple: it stays the same for three decades. While that sounds comforting, the real risk lies in interest rates—not the credit risk that Fannie and Freddie mitigate. They’re not your shield against rising rates; they merely protect lenders when borrowers default.

Plus, fixed-rate mortgages aren’t exclusive to America. Other countries offer them too, like Germany, where you can snag a 20-year fixed mortgage. The availability of these loans here largely stems from our relatively low inflation rates. It’s not just Fannie and Freddie at play!

Q: What do you say to the notion that Fannie and Freddie make mortgages more affordable and boost homeownership rates?

A: Interesting point! Up until the 1980s, Fannie and Freddie were merely rounding errors in the mortgage market, barely making a dent. Homeownership rates have remained stable since the 1960s, indicating that their influence might be overstated. What they actually offer is more of a debt subsidy than a homeownership subsidy. They drive demand for mortgages, but without addressing supply, all they do is inflate prices.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button