Shocking Findings: Misleading Coaching on Using Super for Dental Care!
Announcer: Tune in to Nadia every weekday at 8:30 AM on 720 ABC Radio Perth!
Nadia Mitsopoulos: Remember Daniel Wright? A few months back, he made headlines when he withdrew a whopping $67,000 from his superannuation to cover dental expenses. He paid a company called Supercare $600 to help navigate the paperwork and medical reports for this early access. But here’s the kicker—Supercare neglected to inform Daniel that he’d be hit with a staggering $19,000 tax bill! Can you believe that?
Daniel Wright: Honestly, I was blindsided. Supercare didn’t mention the tax implications at all! I just thought I was getting my teeth fixed. Now, as a dad with kids, I pay child support, and surprise, surprise—my child support payments have doubled because of this! It’s been a mess trying to get answers, and I had no clue this would happen. There are so many hidden costs that I wasn’t prepared for.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: If you’ve faced a similar situation as Daniel, don’t hesitate to reach out to me at 1300 222 720. His case ignited a significant investigation by Consumer Group Choice and Super Consumers Australia, focusing on companies like Supercare that facilitate early access to superannuation. What they uncovered is shocking—people are not being fully informed about the costs involved, and some are being misled, even coached on how to manipulate the system! I had a chat with Xavier O’Halloran, the director of Super Consumers Australia, earlier today. Xavier, good morning!
Xavier O’Halloran: Good morning! Thanks for having me.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: Let’s dive into this—how widespread is the trend of pulling super for dental work?
Xavier O’Halloran: We’ve seen a staggering surge—more than double the applications for early super withdrawals for medical reasons in just a few years.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: Is this alarming?
Xavier O’Halloran: Absolutely. It highlights a genuine cost-of-living crisis. Our investigation revealed that third parties are not just facilitating these withdrawals but are actively coaching individuals on how to extract funds without fully disclosing the repercussions. It’s leading people into making decisions that may not be in their best interest.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: So, regarding legality, are these access brokers operating within the law?
Xavier O’Halloran: It depends. If they start giving financial advice, they might be crossing legal lines. However, they primarily offer a service to help people access their superannuation for legitimate medical needs. It’s meant to be a last resort, and it’s free if done directly through the proper channels. These companies, though, are charging upwards of $700 for a process that should cost nothing!
Nadia Mitsopoulos: What about this coaching you mentioned? What did you uncover?
Xavier O’Halloran: Our investigators posed as clients and found that some of these brokers were encouraging individuals to exaggerate their pain levels. They were linking clients to dentists who would likely approve their claims. There were even promises of refunds if the broker couldn’t help them get their money out. It feels like a slippery slope!
Nadia Mitsopoulos: Can you share some examples of what they were instructed to say to dentists?
Xavier O’Halloran: One significant tactic was emphasizing chronic pain—both physical and emotional. They were coached to highlight how this pain affected their daily lives, echoing tactics seen in the opioid crisis in the U.S. It’s alarming how subjective pain can be used to justify accessing funds.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: But surely there are genuine cases out there?
Xavier O’Halloran: Absolutely. Many individuals have no other way to afford dental care. It’s a failure of the healthcare system when people must resort to accessing their retirement savings just to cover essential medical expenses.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: And these brokers have a preferred dentist list?
Xavier O’Halloran: Yes, they claim to connect clients with dentists who are more likely to approve the claims, further complicating the situation.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: What about the tax implications? Are people aware of what they’re getting into?
Xavier O’Halloran: Unfortunately, most aren’t. Our investigation found that even with the hefty fees, these brokers often fail to disclose that withdrawing funds incurs around a 22% tax. It’s a significant dent in what people believe will cover their dental expenses.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: Daniel Wright’s story is becoming a cautionary tale, isn’t it? He thought he was just fixing his teeth, but now he’s facing a $19,000 loss in retirement savings.
Xavier O’Halloran: It’s a tragic trend. These services rush people into decisions without fully explaining the consequences, leaving them thousands of dollars poorer when they retire.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: Based on your investigation, do you believe people are being misled and coerced into these choices?
Xavier O’Halloran: Without a doubt. People are being misled, coached, and ultimately taken advantage of. It’s heartbreaking to see individuals lose tens of thousands of dollars because they were sold on the idea that accessing super was easy and risk-free.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: And those third parties aren’t disclosing these long-term implications?
Xavier O’Halloran: Exactly. They’re quick to take the money without informing clients of the tax consequences and the impact on their future financial security. A simple withdrawal today can lead to a devastating financial gap come retirement.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: On 720 ABC Radio Perth, we’re with Xavier O’Halloran, the CEO of Super Consumers Australia. What do you think regulators need to do to address this issue?
Xavier O’Halloran: The regulators must take stronger action. The health regulator is responsible for overseeing dentists involved in these claims. We’ve seen some efforts, but given the number of claims being made, there’s a dire need for a more rigorous crackdown on these practices.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: How can they effectively do this?
Xavier O’Halloran: They need to identify these cases more proactively. The ATO is sharing data, which is a step in the right direction, but the laws need to be tightened to prevent third parties from profiting off what should be a free process, while also failing to disclose the implications.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: And when you say it’s a free process, that means people can go directly to their super company or the ATO?
Xavier O’Halloran: Absolutely! There’s no need for a middleman, and that’s the crux of the issue.
Nadia Mitsopoulos: Thank you for shedding light on this crucial issue, Xavier!
