Think Twice: Ottawa’s New Mortgage Rules Could Worsen Consumer Debt!

Open this photo in gallery:

Attention, young dreamers of home ownership! The federal government is urging you to leap headfirst into the deep end of housing debt.

With new mortgage regulations rolling out in mid-December, Ottawa is heralding these changes as the most significant reforms in decades. But before you get swept up in the excitement, let’s break down what this really means for your wallet.

In theory, these changes are designed to make your dreams of owning a home more attainable, particularly for millennials and Gen Zs. The aim? Lower down payments and reduced monthly mortgage bills. Sounds great, right?

But here’s the catch: while you may get your foot in the door faster, you could find yourself buried under a mountain of mortgage debt for much longer than previous generations. You’ll be paying more in interest, and taxpayers will be on the hook for more real estate risks.

As of December 15, the price cap for insured mortgages jumped from $1 million to a staggering $1.5 million. This means you can snag pricier homes with smaller down payments, but at what cost?

If you’re putting down less than 20% of the home’s total price, you’ll need to cough up for mortgage insurance, a safety net for lenders if you default on your loan. Plus, the government is now allowing 30-year amortizations for first-time buyers and those purchasing new builds. Sure, your monthly payment might look kinder, but that extra five years to pay off your loan can add up to thousands in interest over time.

Don’t let these relaxed rules deceive you. They could tether you to debt longer and hit you harder in the wallet. As Bank of Canada senior deputy governor Carolyn Rogers aptly put it, “There’s no free lunch.”

Stretching that mortgage term from 25 to 30 years might shave a few bucks off your monthly bill, but prepare for the reality: you could be paying tens of thousands more in interest!

These lenient rules aren’t just risky for you; they pose a threat to taxpayers too. Higher mortgage caps mean increased exposure for taxpayers who ultimately back these insured loans.

Currently, around one in four mortgages in Canada is insured at origination, translating to nearly $590 billion in taxpayer-backed mortgage debt. Remember when the max for insured mortgages was capped at under $1 million to protect taxpayers? Those days are gone.

And let’s not forget about the ongoing housing affordability crisis. Home prices were already expected to rise with decreasing interest rates, and these relaxed rules will only escalate demand from financially strapped buyers, further inflating prices.

What about the supply side of the equation? The government’s actions do little to address the core issue of housing shortages driving prices up. “Improved housing affordability requires a better balance between supply and demand, and achieving this balance will take time,” Rogers emphasizes.

If high mortgage costs are your barrier to home ownership, why not encourage saving more instead of accumulating debt? After all, a hefty down payment is the smart way to reduce monthly costs and avoid being “house-poor.”

Ottawa could step up by boosting the contribution limits for tax-free first home savings accounts, currently capped at $8,000 annually and $40,000 total. Let’s get real: when was the last time $40,000 could secure a decent down payment?

Recent data indicates that Canadians are finally embracing the idea of saving, with a household savings rate of 7.1% in the third quarter of 2024. Yet, looming economic challenges, including political threats from the U.S., underscore the need for a robust rainy-day fund.

While household debt levels have shown some signs of improvement, the reality is Canadians are still grappling with significant leverage. The ratio of household credit market debt to disposable income stands at 173.1%. That means for every dollar you earn, you’re carrying $1.73 in debt. And yes, mortgage debt can be beneficial if you can genuinely afford a home, but there’s a big difference between being house-rich and having a mortgage-free home.

So, is this really the financial path we want to pave for our young people? Are we doing them a favor by encouraging shortcuts to home ownership? The truth is, the only ones who truly own their homes are those who are mortgage-free.