UK Funds Face Tax Trouble for Skimping on Home Investments!
November 24, 2024
0 3 minutes read
In a bold move that could reshape the landscape of pension investments, the UK government is sending a clear message: invest at home or face the consequences. The head of the British Business Bank has raised the alarm, suggesting that asset managers could lose valuable tax breaks if they don’t step up their game and prioritize domestic investments. This isn’t just a warning—it’s a call to action for an industry that holds the keys to economic growth.
Most Read from Bloomberg
Louis Taylor, the chief executive of the state-owned Bank, emphasized that while he isn’t advocating for drastic changes, the government has the power to creatively enhance funding for essential projects without burdening taxpayers. Instead of simply adding more tax breaks, he suggests a rethink of how existing benefits are allocated, especially when it comes to pension funds. The industry has shown a preference for Australian-style tax reliefs to spur investment, but change is afoot.
Enter Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is banking on the private sector to deliver the swift growth his Labour government has promised. With tax relief on worker pension contributions already providing a significant boost to assets, funds that are slow to invest in the UK are under scrutiny like never before. The stakes couldn’t be higher.
While the government hasn’t yet imposed minimum allocation requirements for UK assets, Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds hinted that all options remain on the table. “We’re not discussing mandates for now, but let’s see where we get to,” she told the Financial Times, underscoring the generous tax relief framework surrounding pension investments.
In a pre-emptive interview with Bloomberg, Taylor proposed that instead of doling out extra tax breaks, the government could opt to claw back existing benefits from funds that underperform in domestic investments. “The exchequer could say, unless your scheme has invested a certain amount in the UK, we will reclaim your tax advantages. This would not only benefit the Treasury but also incentivize more domestic capital flow,” he stated.
Pension contributions are currently enjoying tax deductions worth approximately £50 billion ($63 billion) annually, a critical lifeline for managing public finances. For basic-rate taxpayers, this translates to 20% relief, while top-rate taxpayers enjoy a whopping 45%. A potential levy on pension funds that fall short of investing in the UK wouldn’t entirely eliminate overseas investments; it would merely encourage a reevaluation of priorities.
Starmer has committed to achieving a sustained annual growth rate of 2.5%, with a vision to elevate living standards across the nation. However, this ambition faces significant challenges, particularly against an economy that has struggled with productivity since the 2008-09 crisis. Recent statistics reveal a meager growth of just 1% in the year leading up to September, a situation many attribute to chronic underinvestment in infrastructure and startups.
Ministers are eager for pension funds to allocate at least 5% of their assets domestically, hoping that transparency and accountability will encourage voluntary compliance. Taylor believes that the looming threat of losing tax relief could drive more investment into infrastructure and venture capital but cautions it might also tarnish the UK’s image as an open and free economy to international investors.
“It’s a challenging situation for the government,” Taylor remarked. “There are no quick fixes. Any changes need to be gradual. However, the right moves could significantly impact our growth rate. Both venture capital and infrastructure investments require a long-term perspective, and pension funds are ideally suited for this patient capital.”
The British Business Bank, tasked with bolstering small and medium enterprises, is well-equipped with £7.9 billion to partner with the private sector. This includes managing state loan guarantees and Covid-19 emergency loans aimed at supporting small businesses.
Thus far, the government is treading lightly. Recently, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves announced plans to consolidate the UK’s fragmented pension fund industry, promoting the emergence of larger players capable of taking on significant projects and riskier ventures. This initiative aims to unlock a staggering £80 billion for productive domestic investment. However, she reassured that mandating pension funds is not currently under consideration.
Taylor noted that UK pension funds lag behind their counterparts in the US, Canada, and Australia, often due to a risk-averse management approach. For instance, Canadian funds invest 15 times more in private equity and venture capital than UK funds, yielding better returns for their members.
“We possess the second-largest pension money pool globally, yet it’s not channeling enough into productive assets within our own economy,” Taylor asserted. “The UK should be a priority destination for investment given its strong innovation ecosystem.” Shockingly, UK pension funds now allocate just 4.4% to domestic stocks, a steep decline from 50% at the turn of the millennium, according to New Financial.
Interestingly, not every investor is against the idea of mandates, Taylor revealed. The stringent oversight on fees can sometimes push trustees toward safer, less profitable asset classes. “Some may see mandates as a way to eliminate the uncertainty around whether to invest in venture capital; it’s a means to streamline the process. Others, however, may feel it infringes upon their autonomy,” he remarked.
(Adds growth data in ninth paragraph. An earlier version corrected the timing of Reynolds’ comment to the FT.)
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/morningstar/SIGL6YW7MNGQJAXYOOM36JKVK4.png?w=390&resize=390,220&ssl=1 "Will ‘Rothification’ Change Your Retirement Savings Forever?")
