Unpacking Trump’s Tariff: Why You Might Foot the Bill!
Incoming President Donald Trump has been vocal about his love for tariffs, famously describing them as “the most beautiful word in the dictionary.” He’s even gone as far as to say, “I love tariffs! … Music to my ears!” But what does that really mean for you and me?
In simple terms, a tariff is a tax on imported goods. According to experts, when we talk about tariffs in American history, we’re mainly discussing import tariffs—taxes that apply to products coming into the U.S. from abroad. But why do governments impose these tariffs? The reasons vary: to reduce the trade deficit, to bring jobs back to America, to punish countries for unfair practices, or even to raise revenue for tax cuts.
Here’s how it plays out:
Imagine you want to buy a product from China that costs $50. Before it lands in your hands, our government slaps on a $25 tariff. Suddenly, you’re shelling out $75. China gets its $50, and that extra $25 goes straight to the U.S. Treasury.
So, who’s really footing the bill for these tariffs?
Trump argues that foreign countries, especially China, are paying these tariffs. He envisions “trillions and trillions of dollars pouring into the United States Treasury.” But hold on—experts disagree. They clarify that it’s actually U.S. consumers who are stuck with the tab. “China isn’t writing checks to the U.S. government,” they say. Instead, it’s a transfer of funds from your wallet to the federal government—a tax.
Tariffs have been part of the American trade landscape since the nation’s inception, with George Washington imposing the very first one! History teaches us that tariffs often lead to unforeseen consequences.
Take the sugar tariff, for instance. While it may have given a boost to sugar cane farmers in states like Louisiana and Florida, it has also doubled sugar prices and driven a significant chunk of America’s chocolate and candy manufacturing overseas. Just ask Ford, which suffered from a 25% tariff on imported steel in 2018. The former CEO lamented that these tariffs sliced about a billion dollars off their profits!
In fact, tariffs don’t just elevate the cost of imported goods; they can also inflate prices for domestic alternatives. If there’s a tariff on imported steel, American steelmakers may feel free to raise their prices too, leaving consumers with few options but to pay up.
And let’s talk about retaliation. When the U.S. slapped tariffs on steel, countries like the EU and China retaliated by instituting their own tariffs on American farm goods. Suddenly, farmers—who were completely uninvolved in the steel debate—saw their overseas sales plummet.
Even Ronald Reagan had his reservations back in 1987, warning that “high tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars.”
So, what kind of tariffs is Trump proposing now? During his campaign, he hinted at implementing “universal baseline tariffs,” suggesting that every product from every country could face a tax of 10 to 20 percent. While previous administrations have favored targeted tariffs, a blanket tax would impact all imports, leading to noticeable price hikes across the board.
Recent proposals include double-digit tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China, which could raise prices on everyday items like fruits, electronics, and even medicine. Studies suggest these tariffs could cost 1% of all American jobs, jack up car prices by an average of $3,000, and hit every American household with an annual bill of at least $1,000.
Trump’s transition team has stated that he might avoid taxing goods that have no American-made alternatives. Perhaps he’s playing a strategic game, using tariffs as leverage in negotiations, rather than as a full-fledged policy.
At the end of the day, while tariffs can be a powerful tool for achieving economic or geopolitical goals, they often come with costly side effects. Economists warn that they can lead to retaliatory measures and generally aren’t the most effective means for reaching the goals we all want as Americans.
For more info:
Story produced by Dustin Stephens. Editor: Ed Givnish.
